LinkedIn is often used to promote new business and workplace health and safety books, many of which have been self-published. Before Christmas, I acted on a LinkedIn post and purchased “The Pracademic’s Handbook“. I had heard many conference delegates in 2024 describe themselves as “pracademic” or express a wish to be more of one, and a handbook could be instructional. I was both disappointed and pleased with the book, but mostly disappointed.
Continue reading “Not a Pracademic’s Handbook”
European support for Australia’s ban on engineered stone
The latest edition of the European Trade Union Institute’s HesaMag features articles on Artificial Intelligence, but the go-to article for me was the magazine’s perspective on Australia’s ban on engineered stone.
We often learn more about ourselves by reading how others see us, so I was keen to read the perspective of sociologist Catherine Cavalin and historian Alfredo Menendez Navarro.
Already a member? Log in here
Seeing OHS law as a social law could change how OHS is seen and its future
Occupational health and safety has traditionally been considered under the category of industrial, or industrial relations, but largely this is due to the major advocates of OHS being the trade union movement. So OHS seems to fit with workers’ rights under the issues of wages and conditions, but really OHS is a social law.
According to one definition social law is:
“…any law, rule or regulation (including international treaty obligations) applicable in any jurisdiction concerning
– labour,
– social security,
– the regulation of industrial relations (between government, employers and employees),
– the protection of occupational, as well as public, health and safety,
– the regulation of public participation,
– the protection and regulation of ownership of land rights (both formal and traditional), immovable goods and intellectual and cultural property rights,
– the protection and empowerment of indigenous peoples or ethnic groups,
– the protection, restoration and promotion of cultural heritage, and
– all other laws, rules and regulations providing for the protection of employees and citizens.”
OHS meets several elements of this definition.
Already a member? Log in here
This 2025 forecast offers mixed messaging
Risk and governance software company Navex published a forecast for 2025 which has some occupational health and safety (OHS) relevance. It wrote “Rising temperatures in the workplace: Addressing civility concerns” which said
“Workplaces increasingly mirror the polarization we see in the world, with tensions surrounding diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI), environmental, social and governance (ESG) initiatives, and political differences bubbling to the surface in workplace discord. Ideally, the workplace should be a collaborative environment, but now is a minefield of potential heated disagreements, making workplace civility a top priority for organizations.”
Already a member? Log in here
Disciplinary overlaps may help with worker engagement
There is a considerable overlap between organisational psychology, Human Resources and occupational health and safety (OHS), even though each has developed its own culture and language. People are just starting to acknowledge the overlap and trying to increase it.
One example of that overlap was on display in an interview with prominent podcaster Mel Robbins, who admitted that:
“The hardest thing about what I do is that oftentimes the advice and the tools sound dumb or repetitive…”
Already a member? Log in here
“Physician, heal thyself” – business group objections to new wage theft laws
Starting January 1, 2025, Australia will have new laws and penalties for intentional wage theft beginning January 1, 2025. The usual business lobby groups are bleating about the unfair imposition of costs and time on their members. But what about the significant impact on workers’ health, safety and dignity?
Already a member? Log in here
New class action on sexual abuse in Australian mining
Many of the prominent Australian mining companies are in the process of changing their cultures to minimise the risk of sexual assaults and harassment after several recent damning inquiries into worker health and safety. Everyone seems to agree that cultural change can take a long time. I am not convinced. Change will take time if one operates within the existing organisational and operational parameters and structures. But sometimes, the harm to workers is so great that a long time exacerbates unfairness and injustice.
Already a member? Log in here