The safety profession needs better integration with the environmental initiatives and requirements imposed on business. In many industries compliance management across the quality, environment and safety disciplines has existed in an integrated fashion for years but many professionals in each discipline are unreceptive to change, some deny the need for change.
Australia, over the last few years, has seen an increase in attention to the safe design of workplaces and buildings. This has paralleled the growth in sustainable and energy-efficient building designs. In many circumstances,t the advocates and practitioners of these skills do not talk to one another. One local example can be used to illustrate this inter-disciplinary blockage.
A civic centre in Australia was constructed to a high level of energy efficiency. Many new water and energy conservation features were incorporated into the design. It is a very impressive building but within a few months of the centre opening, employees were reporting injuries.
A lot of the building uses natural timbers, many of which are considerably heavier that other contemporary building materials, such as aluminium. Employees began to report injuries that resulted for having to handle doors, security screens and other building features. Many of the sliding doors were over 3 metres high and included thick thermal glass for much of the body of the door. The use of these elements of sustainable construction had not been considered in the design of the building. The building was environmentally sustainable but had ignored the needs of the people who were required to work in the facility. Workers compensation claims created an additional unnecessary cost that could have been allocated against the building design.
This shortsightedness is not unique but illustrates a need, not for further consultation although the more consultation on OHS issues the better, but for an integrated approach to workplace safety. In this case “workplace safety”, is meant as a safety consideration of all elements of the workplace – noise, design, public traffic, heating, animal access……. the list of options could be endless.
These thoughts were generated by an article in the property section of The Age newspaper on 12 May 2010. The article discusses an assessment tool developed by the Green Building Council of Australia (GBCA) which can be used to determine “the environmental attributes of new and refurbished buildings”. There are some design elements that relate to working with green buildings particularly indoor air quality, lighting and thermal comfort. How closely these are aligned to the occupational health and safety criteria is unclear.
Occupational use criteria could be increased in the assessment tool and some of these could come from the safe design elements. There could also be greater consideration of the intended use of the facilities – office or manufacturing?, public access, shift work possibilities, and facilities management and maintenance. It is accepted that the tool forever remains in development and continuous improvement and it will be interesting to see if the occupational needs of the end users gain more notice.
SafetyAtWorkBlog has put a call into the GBCA for further information on these matters.