The Australian newspaper dismisses workplace deaths as “sickies”

Safe Work Australia has released two important statistical reports. One concerns the number of Work-Related Traumatic Injury Fatalities for 2009-10 and the other is called The Cost of Work-Related injury and Illness for Australian Employers, Workers and the Community: 2008-09 .

These reports have gained minimal mainstream media coverage. In a very short article The Australian newspaper preferred to focus on productivity clauses in workplace agreements following a departmental report, as is its choice, but, more significantly, the newspaper’s headline dismisses the report’s cost estimates on “work-related injuries, illnesses and deaths” as “sickies”.  The report on costs, from where The Australian drew its $A60 billion reference, includes an evaluation of the cost of workplace fatalities, defined in the report on page 18 as

“a work-related injury or disease, which results in death.”

It is enormously insulting that the newspaper includes workplace deaths in its disparaging headline “Workers’ sickies costing us $60bn”. Minister Bill Shorten states in his media release accompanying the reports that:

“Work-related injuries, illnesses and fatalities have a huge impact on Australian society. They can physically and mentally affect workers, colleagues, employers, families and the community. This latest research is evidence of the significant cost to Australia’s economy. Workplace safety is not just about avoiding human tragedy it is also about reducing economic cost for the nation.”

At a time when the Federal Workplace Relations Minister, Bill Shorten, is trying to bring some rigour and dignity to the issue of workplace safety, The Australian newspaper should be ashamed.

Kevin Jones

reservoir, victoria, australia

7 thoughts on “The Australian newspaper dismisses workplace deaths as “sickies””

  1. It seems The Australian may indeed be ashamed of its article’s headline. The online version of the article has had a headline change from “Workers’ sickies costing us $60bn” to “Workplace injuries cost $60bn a year”.

    Far more accurate.

  2. It appears that the newspaper’s safety record is good till date. But, surely with an arrogant attitude towards safety like this, it may endanger safety its own employees and will learn a costly lesson.

  3. Not suprising from a capitalist owned corporation that pushes the barrow in favour of big business at the expnse of those they would exploit.

  4. I worked at a glass factory in WA that had 2 serious workplace accidents (one fatal) in a very short space of time. The company was bankrupt within 2 years. Not because of fines or bad management but purely because the entire workforce was an emotional wreck. People broke down, resigned, turned to drugs and alcohol. It was a family style company that had a workforce of about 40. Most of them long term and loyal. They never recovered from the accidents. Grief killed the company.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.