The occupational health and safety of sex workers is one of the most difficult areas to write about as the industry is politically and ideologically charged with matters of feminist ideology, human rights and sex trafficking, religious morality and NIMBY lobbying. In such an environment, it is important that the OHS needs of sex workers not be forgotten.
On 13 July 2011, The Age newspaper reported on the threat of legal action by one sex workers on a Victorian licensed brothel, Butterflys of Blackburn. The article raised many OHS issues for the brothel industry. In short, the article reports that a sex worker is suing the brothel because the brothel, allegedly, established an expectation that the sex workers would allow unprotected sex, sexual acts without a condom or other protection, an offence under Victorian law. This particular sex worker’s experience in Butterflys of Blackburn was that, when refusing unprotected sex to a client, the client assaulted her, attempted to rape her and threatened her with a gun.
The Age reports that the woman “has since been diagnosed with post traumatic stress disorder, whiplash in her neck and a torn muscle in her shoulder.” The worker is already receiving workers’ compensation and is pursuing compensation for permanent impairment. Her plans for suing the brothel relate to the accusation that the brothel failed to provide a safe workplace.
The Age published an opinion piece on 15 July 2011 by Caroline Norma, an academic with RMIT and member of the Coalition Against Trafficking in Women Australia (CATWA). An important background element of Norma’s comments is that, according to the media release, Norma “researches in the areas of legal prostitution, violence against women and sexual trafficking. Her current research focuses on trafficking into legal brothels in Victoria.” OHS does not feature however SafetyAtWorkBlog has some responses from Caroline Norma’ that will be included in a separate article.
Although Butterflys of Blackburn has Australian and Asian sex workers, SafetyAtWorkBlog has been told that there is nothing unique in this, and that the brothel has not been accused of sex trafficking.
Many sex work opponents equate sex work in a brothel as little more than street sex work indoors. Street sex work is illegal, although tolerated, in Victoria whereas working in a licensed brothel is not. Street sex work is unregulated whereas licensed brothels must comply with the safety obligations under both the Prostitution Control Act and the Occupational Health and Safety Act. The working environments are diametric opposites although similar sex acts, similar work tasks, are undertaken.
Caroline Norma states that
“The idea that women are safe and protected in legal brothels in Victoria is a bureaucratic fantasy.”
Sex workers in brothels are safer than street sex workers. Many brothels have distress buttons in each room. Many brothels have willingly undertaken OHS assessments (dozens provided by this author). All sex workers in licensed brothels must undergo sexual health checks on a monthly basis and it is illegal for a brothel owner to allow a sex worker to work if infected with a sexually transmitted disease or if drug-affected. No alcohol is allowed in licensed brothels. One brothel in Queensland has its safety management systems independently audited to the OHS management standard AS4801. Some brothels have been asked by sex workers to provide wi-fi to allow them to pursue their academic studies.
A source from within the Victorian sex industry has provided SafetyAtWorkBlog with additional details of the case reported on 13 July 2011 that illustrates some familiar OHS matters.
The sex worker believes that since the assault she has been removed from the work rosters for the brothel. Exclusion has been identified as an element of workplace bullying in other industries.
The sex worker has been required to establish her employment status in order to justify action under WorkCover, a justification that is rarely required in other industries and one that, come the OHS law changes on 1 January 2012, may not be required in the future as the employer/employee relationship is replaced in the work health and safety laws by the relationship between worker and a person conducting a business or undertaking.
Personal Protective Equipment
Condoms and dams are essential personal protective equipment (PPE) for sex workers and are legal requirements in legal brothels. Sex work advocates point to the very low STI incidence in sex workers as an indication of the success of such a requirement. In an unpublished letter to The Age’s editor, the CEO of the ‘Resourcing Health and Education in the Sex Industry’ program Inner South Community Health Service, Robbi Chaplin, said
“…epidemiological data consistently shows that sexually transmissible infections (STIs) are lower among sex workers than in the general community. Furthermore, Victorian surveillance data has not recorded a single instance of HIV transmission in a sex work setting.”
The issue of unprotected sex in brothels is often seen as a public health issue but it is more an OHS issue for workers in a similar way to the use of hearing protection, safety glasses and suitable clothing on construction sites and in manufacturing.
A customer was able to enter the brothel with a gun. This is of considerable concern, as it would be in any workplace. Many brothels already have a secure reception area where clients wait for an available worker. In some brothels there are pool tables, coffee machines and large screen televisions in these waiting areas. Many brothels also have pop-up security screens similar to those in the banking sector. Following the case reported in the papers it would be surprising if some brothels did not consider some sort of metal detection or an additional administrative process for addressing this risk.
Occupational violence in the licensed brothel industry is considerably less than one may expect. One sex worker once told me that this is because clients visit the brothel to “f**k, not fight”. Of course, this low level of violence operates on the definition of occupational violence applied by OHS regulators.
“Occupational violence is a physical attack or threat to an employee or group of employees that creates a risk to health and safety. It includes aggression and challenging behaviours and can be categorised as client-initiated and external or intrusive occupational violence.”
Sex work critics assert that prostitution is a form of violence itself and that only the elimination of prostitution will control violence.
Workers’ Compensation Data
Workers’ compensation data for sex work is difficult to obtain for several reasons. A major reason is that there have been less than a dozen claims and the authorities refuse to release details as the small number of claims enables identification of the claimant.
The other reason is that there is no dedicated workers’ compensation classification for sex work. Classification L9369R is for “Personal Services N.E.C.[not elsewhere classified]” where the occupations of “brothel keeping” and “escort agency service” co-exist with solarium operations, tattooing, “weight reduction services” and marriage celebrant (!).
Sex work can be a complicated occupation due to the unique intimate interaction of client and worker. But workplace health and safety in this industry sector is not necessarily complex as the basic principles can be applied, and are being applied, in the licensed brothel industry. It is possible to protect against the transmission of infection, statistics show administrative controls and PPE use have been enormously effective. There are many effective engineering and administrative controls against inappropriate behaviour and occupational violence. Legislation establishes benchmarks for hygiene, worker health and the licensing of brothels, their managers and owners.
Sex work becomes complex when issues that are secondary to the operation of a huge majority of the workplaces intrude, such as sex trafficking. Sex trafficking is a problem that must be addressed but even trafficked workers have a right to work in a safe and healthy work environment, just as do illegal workers in other industries such as construction or agriculture. Their citizenship or employment status does not diminish the obligations of employers, or “persons conducting a business or undertaking”, to provide a safe workplace however it may indicate that an employer who is willing to exploit workers in an economic context is unlikely to have much regard for worker safety.
The action being taken against Butterflys of Blackburn has many layers of complexity, some that SafetyAtWorkBlog cannot divulge without breaching the privacy of the sex worker. The complexity of the proposed legal action and the commentaries on media reports illustrate that “fringe occupations” like sex work are often forgotten in the development of OHS laws and practices. Yet it is often these fringe occupations and unique work tasks that can illustrate flaws in the one-size-fits-all, harmonised work health and safety laws.
9 thoughts on “Brothel safety gains new media attention”
This case is now six years plus old. Very likely the outcome of the case was reported in the media at the time but for most of us accessing the info’ as news floating around somewhere in “the cloud” is impractical. It would be appropriate for the benefit of readers if this thread included a post disclosing the outcome of the action so that this could be read right here.
Alternatively, a link placed right here to where the info’ can be read would meet the case.
Kendrick, I will likely revisit some of the workplace safety aspects of sex work in Victoria, raised in this article, during my review of some of the law and administrative changes that have occurred in this industry sector in Victoria recently. Thanks for your input.
I like this sentence. \”Sex trafficking is a problem that must be addressed but even trafficked workers have a right to work in a safe and healthy work environment …\”.
To paraphrase this, \”People who are repeatedly raped daily have a right to be raped in a safe and healthy environment\”.
Is this a correct (and more clear and explicit) statement of Workplace Safety Services P/L\’s view on trafficking?
Perhaps you do not equate the use of a trafficked persons body as rape. If not, then what precisely is going on when someone who has not freely consented to sex is being used for sex?
See WorkCover NSW http://workcover.nsw.gov.au/formspublications/publications/Documents/brothels_health_safety_guidelines_English_0120.pdf
Maria, Thanks for providing a link to this publication. It remains a very relevant guide and one of the few in existence for this industry. Do you know if Workcover NSW has any plans to revise and update the guidance, particularly as all OHS guidance material will be revised to fit the new harmonised OHS regime?
Could you also provide an update on the status of the Scarlet Alliance\’s best practice OHS guide that was being presented to the Australian OHS regulators several years ago? I found that very useful.
I hope she wins her case. Working girls should always be free to make their own choices. I guess this is the pressure they receive from their bosses in the sex industry.